Connect with us

News

Japanese atomic bomb survivors win Nobel Peace Prize

Published

on

Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese group of atomic bomb survivors, has won the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize.

Known as hibakusha, the survivors of the 1945 bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been recognised by the Norwegian Nobel Committee for efforts to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

Nobel Committee Chair Joergen Watne Frydnes said the group had “contributed greatly to the establishment of the nuclear taboo”.

Mr Frydnes warned the “nuclear taboo” was now “under pressure” – and praised the group’s use of witness testimony to ensure nuclear weapons must never be used again.

Founded in 1956, the organisation sends survivors around the world to share their testimonies of the “atrocious damage” and suffering caused by the use of nuclear weapons, according to its website.

Their work began almost a decade after the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

On 6 August 1945, a US bomber dropped the uranium bomb above the city of Hiroshima, killing around 140,000 people.

Three days later a second nuclear weapon was dropped on Nagasaki. Two weeks later Japan surrendered, ending World War Two.

Speaking to reporters in Japan, a tearful Toshiyuki Mimaki, the co-head of the group, said: “Never did I dream this could happen,” the AFP news agency quotes him as saying.

Mr Mimaki criticised the idea that nuclear weapons bring peace. “It has been said that because of nuclear weapons, the world maintains peace. But nuclear weapons can be used by terrorists,” Mr Mimaki said, according to reports by AFP.

In a BBC interview last year, he said despite only being three years old at the time the nuclear bomb hit Hiroshima – he could still remember dazed and burnt survivors fleeing past his home.

The prize – which consist of a diploma, a gold medal and a sum of $1m (£765,800) – will be presented at a ceremonies in Oslo in December, marking the anniversary of the death of the scientist and prize creator Alfred Nobel.

The group has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize “many times” in the past, including in 2005 when it received a special mention by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, its website says.

The decision to recognise Nihon Hidankyo means the Nobel committee has steered away from more controversial nominees for the peace prize.

There had been widespread speculation the United Nations agency supporting Palestinians – UNRWA – was being considered for the prize.

Although the organisation is the main provider of humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza, nine of its members were fired for alleged involvement in the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7 last year.

More than 12,000 people had signed a petition urging the committee not to award UNRWA the prize.

There were equal concerns about the nomination of the International Court of Justice.

The UN’s main judicial organ is currently considering allegations that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza and has already issued a statement urging the Israeli authorities to refrain from genocidal acts.

But while giving the prize to Nihon Hidankyo may be a non-controversial choice, it could also focus global attention on the threat of nuclear conflict which overshadows the fighting in both Ukraine and the Middle East.

Throughout Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, its leaders have repeatedly hinted that they may be ready to use tactical nuclear weapons if western allies increase their support for Ukraine in a way Russia considers unacceptable.

These threats have succeeded in restraining western support for fear of escalation.

In the Middle East, the subtext for much of Israel’s strategy is the fear that Iran is seeking nuclear capability, something Tehran denies.

The Nobel committee’s decision may renew a debate about the use of nuclear weapons at a time when some countries look enviously at their deterring power.

This year’s peace prize had 286 nominations, a number comprising 197 individuals and 89 organisations.

Nominations can be made by people in positions of significant authority, including members of national assemblies, governments and international courts of law.

Iranian human rights activist Narges Mohammadi won the prize in 2023, when she was honoured for her work fighting the oppression of women in Iran.

Ms Mohammadi is currently being held in Evin prison in Tehran, having already spent 12 years in jail serving multiple sentences related to her activism.

(BBC News)

News

Several Opp. MPs walk out of Parliament

Published

on

By

Several opposition members of Parliament have walked out of the Parliament chamber today (June 17.) in protest over the actions of the Speaker of House, according to Chief Opposition Whip Member of Parliament Gayantha Karunathilleka.

MP Karunathilleka noted that several MPs including those from the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB), walked out of Parliament after the Speaker refused to allocate time to discuss the on-going Iran-Israel conflict.

Continue Reading

News

SL – France sign key debt restructuring agreement

Published

on

By

Sri Lanka and France signed a bilateral agreement yesterday (June 16) in Colombo, marking a major milestone in Sri Lanka’s external debt restructuring process, the Ministry of Finance announced.

The bilateral agreement was signed by Mahinda Siriwardana, Secretary of the Ministry of Finance, Planning, and Economic Development, on behalf of the government and William Roos, Assistant Secretary, Multilateral Affairs, Trade and Development Policies Department, Directorate-general of the Treasury, on behalf of the government of France.

The statement by the Finance Ministry added that the government of France played a pivotal role in spearheading Sri Lanka’s external debt restructuring process, co-chairing the Official Creditor Committee alongside Japan and India.

The Ministry noted that the agreement would further strengthen the longstanding bilateral relationships between the two nations.

Continue Reading

News

SC orders NIC recognition for Buddhist Bhikkhuni, citing FR violation

Published

on

By

In a landmark judgement upholding the right to equal treatment, the Supreme Court, by majority decision yesterday, issued an order directing the Commissioner General of the Department of Registration of Persons to issue a National Identity Card (NIC) to a Buddhist Bhikkhuni, recognising her status as a Bhikkhuni instead of “Sil Matha”.

Chief Justice Murdu Fernando and Justice Gamini Amarasekera, in agreement, held that the petitioner’s Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 12(1) of the Constitution had been violated by the Commissioner General of the Department of Registration of Persons.

It was alleged that the Commissioner General (the first respondent), without obtaining verification from the proper authority, namely the second petitioner, the Chief Incumbent of the Golden Temple in Dambulla, refused to include the designation “Bhikkhuni” in the petitioner’s NIC.

“It is obvious that if the first petitioner (the Bhikkhuni) had been male, she would not have encountered these difficulties. She has been denied recognition as a Bhikkhuni, despite being acknowledged as such by the Rangiri Dambulu Buddhist Chapter to which she belongs, an order recognised by the Government. Hence, it is clear that her rights under Article 12(1) of the Constitution have been violated by the actions and conduct of the first respondent,” Justice Amarasekera observed.

However, in a separate judgement, Justice Mahinda Samayawardhena dismissed the petition, stating that the Supreme Court should refrain from intervening in ecclesiastical matters that fall within the purview of relevant religious authorities.

This application was filed before the Supreme Court under Articles 17 and 126 of the Constitution, alleging that the failure to issue an NIC to the first petitioner recognising her status as a Bhikkhuni amounted to an infringement, or imminent and continuing infringement, of her right to equal treatment under Article 12(1).

The first petitioner, Ven. Welimada Dhammadinna Bhikkhuni, is a Bhikkhuni who has received higher ordination (Upasampada) from the Rangiri Dambulu Rajamaha Vihara Sangha Sabhawa (the Rangiri Dambulla Chapter of the Siyam Maha Nikaya).

The second petitioner is the Chief Incumbent of the Golden Temple in Dambulla, affiliated with the same Sangha Sabhawa.

The petitioners submitted that since 1998, the Department of Registration of Persons had issued NICs to Bhikkhunis using the title “Bhikkhuni” after their names, thus fully recognising their status without objection. However, the second petitioner later became aware that the Department had intermittently used the title “Sil Matha” instead, without a rational basis for refusing to issue NICs bearing the title “Bhikkhuni”.

Relevant documentation indicated that the Department had previously accepted the designation “Bhikkhuni”. The first petitioner’s claim was based on the violation of her right to equality and equal protection under the law as guaranteed by Article 12(1).

The petitioner also stated that she had a legitimate expectation based on the prior practice of issuing NICs with the designation “Bhikkhuni”.

The petitioners further noted that the Department had informally communicated that NICs with the title “Bhikkhuni” could no longer be issued, and that only NICs bearing the designation “Sil Matha” would be provided. The first petitioner rejected that offer and declined to accept an NIC under that title. They argued that Bhikkhunis face significant hardship due to the refusal to issue NICs with the correct designation of “Bhikkhuni”.

President’s Counsel Navin Marapana, with Nandapala Wickramasooriya, Tharanatha Palliyaguruge, and Uchitha Wickramasinghe, instructed by Eashanie Palliyaguruge, appeared for the petitioners. Deputy Solicitor General Kanishka de Silva Balapatabendi appeared for the respondent.

(dailymirror.lk)

(Except for the headline, this story, originally published by dailymirror.lk has not been edited by SLM staff)

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Sri Lanka Mirror. All Rights Reserved