Connect with us

News

India won’t accept third-party mediation on Kashmir, Modi tells Trump

Published

on

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has told US President Donald Trump that Delhi will never accept third-party mediation with Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir, India’s senior-most diplomat said.

Foreign secretary Vikram Misri said that Modi “strongly” conveyed India’s long-held stand to Trump during a phone call between the two leaders on Tuesday.

Trump has repeatedly offered to mediate between India and Pakistan to solve the “Kashmir issue” since a four-day conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbours in May.

The White House has not commented on India’s statement.

Mr Misri also said that Modi told Trump “clearly” that during the duration of the conflict, “no talks were held at any level on the India-America trade deal or on the mediation between India and Pakistan by America”.

Trump has repeatedly claimed that India and Pakistan ended the conflict after a ceasefire brokered by the US and also that he used trade as a lever to make them agree. Pakistan has backed US claims of brokering the ceasefire but India has denied it.

“The talks regarding cessation of military action were held directly between India and Pakistan under the existing channels established between both militaries,” Mr Misri said.

Last month, Trump told reporters: “I said, ‘Come on, we’re going to do a lot of trade with you guys [India and Pakistan]. Let’s stop it. Let’s stop it. If you stop it, we’ll do a trade. If you don’t stop it, we’re not going to do any trade.'”

Delhi is rushing to negotiate a trade deal with the Trump administration before a 90-day pause on higher tariffs ends on 9 July.

Kashmir is a contentious issue for both India and and Pakistan, who claim the region in whole, but administer it only in part. Bilateral talks over several decades have not led to any resolution.

India treats Kashmir as an integral part of its territory and rules out any negotiation, particularly through a third party.

Tensions escalated between the South Asian neighbours after India blamed Pakistan for a 22 April attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir in which 26 people, mainly tourists, were killed. Islamabad denied the charge.

In May, India carried out air strikes on what it called terrorist infrastructure inside Pakistan, leading to four days of intense military action from both sides of the border.

Both countries accused each other of targeting airbases and other military sites.

As the conflict between the two nuclear-armed nations threatened to escalate further, Trump announced on 10 May that India and Pakistan had agreed to a “full and immediate ceasefire”, brokered by the US.

Later, in a post on Truth Social, he said: “I will work with you both to see if, after a thousand years, a solution can be arrived at, concerning Kashmir.” (The Kashmir issue only dates back to 1947).

A statement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio the same day said that the two countries had also agreed “to start talks on a broad set of issues at a neutral site”.

On 11 May, Trump repeated praise for India and Pakistan’s leaders for understanding it was “time to stop the current aggression”, adding that he was proud the US “was able to help you arrive at this historic and heroic decision”.

After Trump’s statement on the ceasefire, Pakistan’s foreign minister said the agreement had been reached by the two countries, adding that “three dozen countries” were involved in the diplomacy.

India has, however, consistently denied any intervention by the US.

Analysts say Trump’s very public statements on offers of mediation over Kashmir have tested Delhi’s red lines on the issue.

Delhi has always encouraged its Western partners not to treat India and Pakistan as equals. It also discourages western leaders from undertaking visits to India and Pakistan at the same time.

But Trump’s tweets often hold India and Pakistan as equals. This has caused some discomfort in Delhi’s diplomatic circles but analysts believe it’s too early to say whether this will affect ongoing trade deal talks between Washington and Delhi.

(BBC News)

News

Sri Lanka hit with 30% US tariffs

Published

on

By

US President Donald Trump today (July 09) announced a fresh round of tariffs targeting seven countries — Sri Lanka, Algeria, Brunei, Iraq, Libya, Moldova and the Philippines.

Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, to share official tariff letters sent directly to the heads of state of these nations.

These tariffs will come into effect from August 01.  This move comes just a day after Trump unveiled a sweeping round of import tariffs of up to 40% on goods from 14 nations, including key trade players such as Bangladesh, Japan, and South Korea.

Accordingly, the countries with newly announced tariffs are :
1. Sri Lanka: 30%
2. Iraq: 30%
3. Algeria: 30%
4. Libya: 30%
5. Philippines: 25%
6. Brunei: 25%
7. Moldova: 25%

The 30% tariff announced for Sri Lanka is significantly less than the 44% initially announced in March. 

Negotiation talks also took place between the US and a GoSL team in Washington.

Relationship, “far from reciprocal”

The US President’s letter to his Sri Lankan counterpart – Anura Kumara Disanayake, emphasizes the United States’ commitment to fostering a fair and reciprocal trading partnership with Sri Lanka. 

Despite a longstanding trade deficit, the U.S. has agreed to continue its economic engagement with the South Asian nation, albeit under revised terms aimed at correcting what President Trump described as “unsustainable Trade Deficits.”
“Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from reciprocal,” the letter states.

The letter also warns that any increase in Sri Lankan tariffs on U.S. goods would result in a proportional increase in the U.S. tariff rate beyond the initial 30%.

The letter also extended an invitation to Sri Lankan companies to invest directly in the United States, noting that products manufactured domestically would be exempt from the new tariffs. He assured expedited approvals for such ventures, promising a streamlined process “in a matter of weeks.”

(Agencies)

Related News : 

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Clarence’s wife wins copyright case against Sarath Kothalawala

Published

on

By

The Supreme Court has recently delivered its judgment in favor of Sheela Wijewardene, the wife of the late veteran musician Clarence Wijewardene, against Sarath Kothalawala of Torana Music.

The appeal stems from an action filed in the Commercial High Court by Mrs. Wijewardene (Appellant) in alleging that copyright in the lyrics and musical compositions of several songs authored by the veteran musician, late Clarance Wijewardene, has been infringed by the Sarath Kothalawala and Rajiv Sebastian (Respondents) by performing the said songs and producing compact discs incorporating the said songs.

The Appellant had sought an injunction, damages, and the delivering up of infringing materials against the Respondents in the said action filed in the Commercial High Court. During the pendency of the action in the Commercial High Court, the 2nd Respondent- Rajiv Sebastian had entered into a settlement with the appellant admitting the intellectual property rights of the late Clarance Wijewardene and agreeing to pay Rs. 2,000,000.00 as damages.  At the conclusion of the trial, the Commercial High Court granted the Permanent Injunction in favour of Mrs. Clarence Wijewardene against the first Respondent Sarath Kothalawala among other reliefs sought.

An appeal was preferred to the Supreme Court in the year 2013 by Mrs. Clarence Wijewardene seeking the other reliefs. The Supreme Court has upheld the Commercial High Court’s decision of granting the Permanent Injunction against the first Respondent which is in essence;

A permanent injunction restraining the 1st defendant from directly or indirectly reproducing, carrying out any public performance or communicating to the public in any other manner songs in which the economic and moral rights in respect of the lyrics and music compositions belong to the estate of the late Mr. Clarence Wijewardena.

The court further issued a permanent injunction restraining the 1st defendant from advertising, promoting, offering for sale and the sale of Audio Compact Discs and the Audio Visual Work titled ‘Viduru Mal’, ‘Sing along with Rajiv Sebastian’, ‘Reka Heenen Piyamba’ and ‘torana Sinhala Karaoke Vol.2’; and distorting the original music compositions of those songs created by the late Mr. Clarence Wijewardena.

The Supreme Court has not granted compensation or damages against the 1st Respondent, citing agreements between the Respondents where the 2nd Defendant-Respondent had misrepresented ownership of the works and the settlement entered into between the 2nd Respondent and the Appellant. However, the Supreme Court has found that the Commercial High Court had erred in not granting the Plaintiff’s prayer for the delivering up of infringing material in the possession of the 1st Respondent and amended the Judgment of the Commercial High Court accordingly. Thus, the 1st Respondent has been ordered by the Supreme Court to deliver up to the Petitioner all the infringing material in the possession of the 1st Respondent including all copies of the Audio Compact Discs and the Audio Visual Work ‘Sing along with Rajiv Sebastian’, ‘Viduru Mal’, ‘Reka Heenen Piyamba’ and ‘Torana Sinhala Karaoke Vol 2’. This relief granted by the Supreme Court is in addition to the Permanent Injunction granted by the Commercial High Court by judgement dated 30/07/2012.

The Judgment has been delivered by a bench comprised of Justices E.A.G.R. Amarasekara, A.L. Shiran Gooneratne, and Arjuna Obeyesekere.

Dr. Harsha Cabral, PC, with Kushan Illangatillake, instructed by V.W. Kularatne Associates represented the Appellant whilst Mr. M.S.A. Wadood, with Palitha Subasinghe, Tharanga Edirisinghe, Hashane Mallawarachchi, and Dulmini Liyanage, instructed by S.B. Dissanayake Associates, represented the 1st Respondent.

(dailymirror.lk)

(This story, originally published by dailymirror.lk has not been edited by SLM staff)

Continue Reading

News

Public urged to use drinking water sparingly amid dry weather

Published

on

By

Due to the prevailing dry weather conditions, the National Water Supply and Drainage Board (NWSDB) has requested consumers to use drinking water sparingly and only for essential purposes.

The NWSDB states that the ongoing extreme dry weather conditions across the island is causing a rapid decline in water levels at major sources while water consumption has also increased significantly due to the heat.
It also requests the public to minimize using water for non-essential tasks like washing vehicles and gardening, and to use water only for essential daily needs.

The NWSDB also said that water pressure may be lower than usual in highland areas because of the increased demand.

The NWSDB expresses its regret over the inconvenience caused to the public and urged to direct any inquiries to the ‘1939’ hotline for further information or assistance.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Sri Lanka Mirror. All Rights Reserved