Connect with us

News

NPC & Actg. IGP clash over police OIC transfers

Published

on

The National Police Commission (NPC) and the Acting IGP Priyantha Weerasooriya have locked horns over the transfer of Officers in Charge (OIC) of police stations with the dispute reaching the Constitutional Council (CC).

Acting IGP Weerasoorirya had written to the NPC this week requesting that he be delegated the responsibility of making the OIC appointments but the NPC had replied rejecting the request and copied the letter to the CC.

The dispute between the NPC and the Acting IGP spilled over the public arena yesterday after IGP Weerasooriya accused the NPC of interfering with the internal work of the Police Department and that without the necessary powers to do transfers, he was only an IGP in name.

“The Police Department sought the opinion of the Attorney General and we were informed that these are not ‘appointments’; but are ‘transfers’ and hence can be undertaken by the IGP,” he said at a press briefing yesterday.

A senior source at the NPC vehemently denied the Acting IGP’s charge and said that the Commission is acting within the power granted to it by the Constitution and could not deviate from the laid out procedure when approving OIC appointments.

“There is a set procedure to be followed when approving appointment of OICs as paid down by the Public Service Commission (PSC). We have to follow thata procedure,” the source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

 So far of the 197 names that were recommended by the Acting IGP for OIC appointments , the NPC has approved around 140 names while a few were withheld due to them lacking the necessary qualifications to hold such a position,  the Sunday Times learns.

The NPC source said that failure to adhere to the laid out procedure would result in such appointments being challenged in court as has happened several times. “It is not a matter of us wanting to hold onto these powers but we are acting within the law. If such powers are to be delegated to the IGP, we have to consult the AG and get his opinion,” the source said.

Under the 21st Amendment to the Constitution, the NPC has wide powers over the appointment, promotion, transfers, disciplinary control, and dismissal of police officers other than the IGP. Vested with powers to act as an independent oversight body for the police, its main objective is the depoliticisation of the Police Department.

The NPC is chaired by retired High Court Judge Lalith Ekanayake. Other members of the Commission are retired Ministry Secretary Renuka Ekanayake, retired District Secretary K. Karunaharan, Attorney-at-Law Dilshan Kapila Jayasuriya, President’s Counsel A.A.M. Iliyas and retired Deputy Inspector General Jayantha Jayasinghe.

(sundaytimes.lk)
(Except for the headline, this story, originally published by sundaytimes.lk has not been edited by SLM staff)

News

PMD issues statement on alleged presidential pardon of prisoner

Published

on

By

The President’s Media Division (PMD) has issued an official statement highlighting a serious procedural irregularity involving the release of a prisoner from Anuradhapura Prison, who was not approved under the presidential pardon granted for the 2025 Vesak festival.

According to the PMD, W.H. Athula Thilakaratne, an inmate serving a sentence for financial fraud, was released despite not being included in the list of prisoners approved by the President for a general pardon.

The PMD clarified that under Article 34(1) of the Constitution, the President has the authority to grant pardons to convicted prisoners.

Accordingly, a list of prisoners selected by the Prison Superintendents is forwarded to the Ministry of Justice.

The list is examined by the Ministry of Justice and then sent to the Presidential Secretariat. With the approval of the President, those prisoners are granted a general pardon, the PMD stated.

In this instance, the official list—submitted by the Commissioner General of Prisons on May 6, 2025—included 388 names.

However, the name of the individual imprisoned at Anuradhapura Prison in connection with financial fraud was not included in that list.

“This individual was not included in the list of 388 prisoners granted a presidential pardon,” the PMD stated.

In light of this development, the Presidential Secretariat lodged a formal complaint with the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) yesterday (June 6), under the title “Release of a Prisoner without Presidential Approval under the Presidential Pardon.”

The PMD further confirmed that a formal investigation has been launched, and disciplinary measures will be taken against any officials found responsible for the irregular release.(adaderana.lk)
(This story, originally published by adaderana.lk has not been edited by SLM staff)

Continue Reading

News

Presidential pardon was routine, not personal – Prisons Commissioner

Published

on

By

The Department of Prisons has issued a statement defending the release of W. M. Athula Tilakaratne, a former finance company manager convicted of misappropriating Rs. 4 million, clarifying that it was part of a general presidential pardon granted on Vesak Poya Day.

Prisons Media Spokesman and Commissioner Gamini B. Dissanayake stated that Tilakaratne was among a group of inmates released under the annual Vesak pardon, which is granted to prisoners who meet certain conditions. He noted that the individual was not specifically singled out for release, but was eligible under the general criteria due to his sentence and the remission of the fine imposed by court.

According to the statement, Tilakaratne had been convicted under Section 386 of the Penal Code and sentenced to a suspended prison term with a fine of Rs. 20 lakhs as compensation. The High Court had also ruled that failure to pay the fine would result in six months of rigorous imprisonment. His release was granted as the fine was waived under the Vesak pardon provisions.

The Department emphasized that Tilakaratne was released in accordance with existing procedures and that the pardon was not targeted or exceptional.

Yesterday, Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) MP Ajith P. Perera raised questions in Parliament regarding the pardon, highlighting that the release occurred just weeks after Tilakaratne’s conviction. He called on the government to explain the process and transparency behind granting such pardons, especially as the individual is reportedly facing other cases as well.

The government did not respond to the MP’s query during the session. 

(newswire.lk)

(Except for the headline, this story, originally published by newswire.lk has not been edited by SLM staff)

Continue Reading

News

Supplementary medical professionals end strike

Published

on

By

The Joint Council for Professions Supplementary to Medicine (JCPSM) has decided to end the strike at 8.00 am today (June 07).

Secretary Chanaka Dharmawickrama stated that the decision was made after 04 of the 05 affiliated unions agreed to call off the strike, considering the inconvenience caused to patients.

However, medical laboratory professionals will continue their strike action.

He added that if their demands are not met, the temporarily suspended strike could be resumed in the future.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Sri Lanka Mirror. All Rights Reserved