Connect with us

News

President’s Secretary refutes EC’s call to halt development programs

Published

on

President’s Secretary Saman Ekanayake has informed the Chairman of the Election Commission R. M. L. Ratnayake that since the various development and welfare programmes implemented by the Government are not illegal activities, it is not possible to issue written orders and instructions to government officials to stop those programmes.  

This is in response to a letter sent by the Election Commission Chairman to the President’s Secretary noting as the Presidential Election will be held soon, complaints have been received from many parties that party and candidate promotions are being carried through development programmes in the country and all institutions should be requested to stop this illegal practice which is being done in violation of the directives issued by the Election Commission.

In that letter, the President’s Secretary has recalled that two years ago, the country was economically bankrupt and the then government was not able to meet the basic needs of the people and the situation was such that there was no conducive atmosphere either to discuss or hold elections.

The President’s Secretary points out that although the economy has reached a stable state through the economic reform programme implemented together with the IMF, according to the data of the Department of Census and Statistics, one out of every six Sri Lankans is suffering from multidimensional poverty and an agreement has been reached with the IMF to bring them to a full economic recovery and for this purpose it is essential to continue the development programmes and meet revenue targets.

The President’s Secretary emphasises that if there is any obstacle to the programme, the country’s economy will collapse again and it will be inevitable that the country will go into a severe economic crisis. It has also been mentioned that the Government has no intention of making the low-income earners who have been living in the grip of the economic crisis even more miserable.

The President’s Secretary has also stated that he is not able to give written orders and instructions to the government officials to stop the development and welfare programmes as requested since he is not able to interpret the various development and welfare programmes implemented by the government as illegal actions as stated in the letter of the Chairman of the Election Commission.

President’s Secretary Ekanayake has also mentioned in his letter that it is appropriate to give space to all the relevant parties to present their facts while dealing with the complaints received by the Election Commission.

He has also said during the Presidential Election period, the Election Commission should pay due attention to the economy of the country and the living conditions of the low-income people and to the Articles 104b(4a)(a) and 104b(4a)(b) of the Constitution when issuing guidelines to public institutions and officials.

dailynews.lk
(Except for the headline, this story, originally published by dailynews.lk has not been edited by SLM staff)

News

President’s and former President Ranil’s allocations same – MP Kabir

Published

on

By

Kegalle District SJB MP Kabir Hashim yesterday accused the Government citing that the budget of Presidents Ranil Wickremesinghe and Anura Kumara Dissanayake are the same.

Hashim said the Interim Vote on Account presented yesterday allocated the same amount to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake for the first four months of 2025 as was allocated to former President Ranil Wickremesinghe for the first four months of 2024.

Hashim stated this while speaking during the debate on the Government’s interim budget. 

NPP MP Lakmali Hemachandra responding to the allegation made by MP Kabir Hashim said in Parliament that the US$ 1,300 million given to the Presidential Secretariat by the World Food Programme is included in the President’s expenditure head, and when all of that is added up, it has been equal to former President’s Ranil Wickremesinghe’s expenditure head. 

She said that the budget for President’s personal staff has been reduced by 64 percent this time. 

MP Kabir Hashim said that the NPP continued to accuse the former President of having too many privileges.

But there is no visible difference in the interim budget presented by the NPP Government.

In 2024, Rs. 1.4 trillion has been allocated for former Presidents under the Presidential Expenditure Head from January to April. In 2025, the same amount of Rs.1.4 trillion has been allocated to the present President from this interim budget from January to April. 

There is no difference in that amount. So what is the difference?” asked MP Hashim.

(DailyNews)

(This story, originally published by DailyNews has not been edited by SLM staff)

Continue Reading

News

Sathosa to sell rice at Rs. 220 per kilo

Published

on

By

Trade, Commerce, Food Security and Co-operative Development Minister Wasantha Samarasinghe told Parliament yesterday that action will be taken to sell 200,000 kilograms of rice daily to the public through the ‘Lanka Sathosa’, at a controlled price of Rs.220 per kilo to the public from today.

The Minister also said that steps will be taken to provide a coconut to the people in the suburban areas through Lanka Sathosa at a price of Rs.130 a nut within the next two weeks. He said this while participating in the debate on the government’s policy statement presented by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake recently.

The Minister also said that rice mill owners have agreed to release 200,000 kilos of rice per day to be sold through Lanka Sathosa at a price of Rs.220 per kilo.

The Minister also said that considering the current demand for rice in the local market and the damage caused to paddy cultivation due to heavy rains, the rice import restrictions have been lifted until midnight on December 20. The Minister also stated that the Government has taken steps to provide solutions to this problem by making rice available in the market as a solution to the rice shortage that has arisen in the market. Steps have been taken to solve the coconut shortage in the market in the next two to three weeks and to prevent consumers from exploiting. For this, 1 million coconuts will be released to the market.

In the past, various individuals and institutions have intervened to create shortages of goods in the country. We are trying to resolve this problem through discussions with those individuals and organisations. Otherwise, we will take specific measures as a government to prevent the people from being inconvenienced and exploiting,” he said.

(dailynews.lk)

(This story, originally published by dailynews.lk has not been edited by SLM staff)

Continue Reading

BIZ

DSI obtains enjoining order against infringement of ‘Fun Souls’ brand

Published

on

By

Action was filed in the Commercial High Court of Colombo by DSI through their Attorneys Sudath Perera Associates against the entity Lakpa Footwear Ltd., with its headquarters based in Horana. The action was filed for the infringement of DSI’s ‘Fun Souls’ trademark and brand and the shoe design on the basis of trademark infringement, unfair competition, and passing-off.

D. Samson & Sons Ltd., widely known as DSI, is a leading homegrown brand and manufacturer of footwear, apparel, and bicycle tyres across the country and has established a strong reputation for quality products in Sri Lanka since its inception. In 2016, DSI introduced and developed the brand ‘Fun Souls’ with a youth identity, to offer a range of unique shoes and bags, including infant shoes, toddler shoes, boys’ and girls’ footwear, and accessories. This ‘Fun Souls’ shoe design was an original concept presented by the DSI brand family.

On 1 November, Commercial High Court Judge Jagath A. Kahandagamage issued an enjoining order against the Defendant for engaging in the sale of kids’ footwear with a brand name/design identical or confusingly similar to the ‘Fun Souls’ trademark and the shoe design.

The Plaintiff, DSI, pleaded that the Defendant has copied the mark ‘Fun Souls’ and the design of the shoe belonging to the Plaintiff in a similar manner with the deliberate intention of passing off its products as those of the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff further pleaded that the slight, insignificant changes in the impugned mark and the design used by the Defendant are unnoticeable to the average consumer and deliberately adopted with the mala fide intention of the Defendant to usurp the goodwill and reputation of the Plaintiff’s ‘Fun Souls’ trademark and the shoe design.

The Commercial High Court, after hearing the submissions of the Lead Counsel for the Plaintiff, issued an enjoining order as requested by the Plaintiff. The order restrains the Defendant from continuing to use or carrying out business using its infringing shoe design, under the name, sign, or mark ‘Fun Shoe,’ which is misleadingly similar to the Plaintiff’s trademark ‘Fun Souls’ and its associated shoe design.

It also prohibits the Defendant from using any other variation of the name, sign, mark, or shoe design that is confusingly similar to the Plaintiff’s trademark or trade name, and from adopting any trade name or trademark that could cause confusion with the Plaintiff’s trademark or trade name.

(ft.lk)

(This story, originally published by ft.lk1st has not been edited by SLM staff)

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Sri Lanka Mirror. All Rights Reserved