Connect with us

News

Trump backs Waltz after Yemen war security breach

Published

on

President Donald Trump expressed support on Tuesday for his national security adviser, Michael Waltz, after a magazine journalist said on Monday that Waltz had accidentally included him in a discussion of highly sensitive war plans on the messaging app Signal.
“Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man,” Trump told NBC News in a phone interview.

U.S. senators were set to grill Trump’s top intelligence officials on Tuesday about the apparent breach, which triggered outrage and disbelief among Democrats and national security experts.

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, said in a report on Monday that Waltz unexpectedly added him on March 13 to an encrypted chat group on the Signal messaging app coordinating U.S. action against the Yemen rebel group over its attacks on Red Sea shipping.

National Security Council spokesperson Brian Hughes said the chat group appeared to be authentic. The White House said it was looking into how Goldberg’s number was added to the thread.

Democrats – and some of Trump’s fellow Republicans – called for an investigation of what appeared to be a major security breach. Classified and sensitive information is not supposed to be shared on commercial mobile phone apps, and unknown numbers – such as Goldberg’s – should not be included.

Members of the Senate Intelligence Committee were to question two of the administration officials on the chat – Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe – on Tuesday during the panel’s annual hearing on Worldwide Threats to U.S. Security.

In his opening statement, Senator Mark Warner, the Democratic vice chairman of the intelligence committee, said a military or intelligence officer who took similar action would be fired.”Yesterday, we stunningly learned that senior members of this administration, and according to reports, two of our witnesses here today, were members of a group chat that discussed highly sensitive and likely classified information that supposedly even included weapons packages, targets and timing and included the name of an active CIA agent,” he said.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Goldberg of sensationalizing the story in a post on X and asserted that no war plans were discussed and no classified material was sent to the thread.In his article, Goldberg wrote that hours before the U.S. launched strikes against Yemen’s Houthis on March 15, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted operational details about the plan in the messaging group, “including information about targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.”

His report omitted the details out of national security concerns, but Goldberg termed it a “shockingly reckless” use of a Signal chat.SECURITY RISKS

It remained unclear why the officials chose to chat via Signal rather than the secure government channels typically used for sensitive discussions.

Signal has a “stellar reputation and is widely used and trusted in the security community,” said Rocky Cole, whose cybersecurity firm iVerify helps protect smartphone users from hackers.

“The risk of discussing highly sensitive national security information on Signal isn’t so much that Signal itself is insecure,” Cole added. “It’s the fact that nation states threat actors have a demonstrated ability to remotely compromise the entire mobile phone itself. If the phone itself isn’t secure, all the Signal messages on that device can be read.”Accounts that appeared to represent Vice President JD Vance, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Ratcliffe, Gabbard, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, and senior National Security Council officials were assembled in the chat group, Goldberg wrote.

While some Democrats called for officials on the chat to lose their security clearances or resign, there was no immediate word on whether any official would face consequences.

White House officials and some fellow Republicans instead stressed that the attack on the Houthis had gone off without a hitch.

(Reuters)

News

Chinese embassy to launch new online visa system

Published

on

By

The Chinese Embassy in Sri Lanka has announced that they will officially launch the “China Visa Online Application System” from June 30, 2025.

An embassy spokesperson has addressed the following FAQs with regard to the new system. 

For further details and enquiries, please visit https://consular.mfa.gov.cn/VISA/.htm or contact the Consular Office (Tel: 0094-112676658;Email: [email protected]), the embassy adds.

A: Applicants can visit the website https://consular.mfa.gov.cn/VISA/ to fill out the visa application form online, upload the required documents, and the application will enter the preliminary review phase. During this period, applicants can log into the website to check the application status and, as required, modify the form or supplement application documents. When the status of the order changes to “Passport to be submitted”, please submit the application in person with passport and documents, provide biometric information (e.g. fingerprints). The application will now enter the final review stage. If approved, the applicant is required to visit the Chinese Embassy again to collect the passport and visa and pay visa fees.

A: Yes, the online visa application system requires an account registration and login. Currently, only email registration is supported.

A: When filling out the application form online, applicants can still select “Normal” or “Express” processing method. However, this selection does not affect the timeline of the preliminary review phase. The expedited processing will only accelerate the procedure after the online preliminary review is approved and physical documents have been submitted offline. An additional fee is required for expedited processing, and the request cannot be revoked once submitted. If the consular officer decides to extend the processing time based on a case-by-case review, the expedited service fee will not be refunded.
Generally, the online preliminary review takes about 1-3 working days, and the review after submitting the passport takes 3-4 working days. Submitting an application too early (e.g. 1 month or more in advance) may cause a backlog in the visa system and may not be processed in a timely manner.It is recommended to apply for a visa two or three weeks in advance.

A: Online applications can be processed by yourself or by someone else.
Except for those who meet the conditions for exemption from fingerprints collection, after the online preliminary review is passed, applicants must leave fingerprints when submitting passports and other materials to the Embassy. Those who are exempt from fingerprint collection can entrust others to submit passports, collect visa and pay for the fees.

A: The visa application system will be undergoing an upgrade from 17:00 on June 27 to 08:00 on June 30. Any applications submitted during this period are invalid. After 08:00 on June 30, apply via the new procedure.
Visa application forms submitted through the original system before June 27 remain valid. You may submit your documents in person using the existing procedure by 17:00 on June 27. After this time, applicants must reapply online through the new process.

A: No. The new system is only applicable to visas for mainland China. Applicants who are eligible to apply for Hong Kong and Macao visas at our Embassy still submit their application documents to the Embassy in the original way.

Continue Reading

News

India won’t accept third-party mediation on Kashmir, Modi tells Trump

Published

on

By

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has told US President Donald Trump that Delhi will never accept third-party mediation with Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir, India’s senior-most diplomat said.

Foreign secretary Vikram Misri said that Modi “strongly” conveyed India’s long-held stand to Trump during a phone call between the two leaders on Tuesday.

Trump has repeatedly offered to mediate between India and Pakistan to solve the “Kashmir issue” since a four-day conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbours in May.

The White House has not commented on India’s statement.

Mr Misri also said that Modi told Trump “clearly” that during the duration of the conflict, “no talks were held at any level on the India-America trade deal or on the mediation between India and Pakistan by America”.

Trump has repeatedly claimed that India and Pakistan ended the conflict after a ceasefire brokered by the US and also that he used trade as a lever to make them agree. Pakistan has backed US claims of brokering the ceasefire but India has denied it.

“The talks regarding cessation of military action were held directly between India and Pakistan under the existing channels established between both militaries,” Mr Misri said.

Last month, Trump told reporters: “I said, ‘Come on, we’re going to do a lot of trade with you guys [India and Pakistan]. Let’s stop it. Let’s stop it. If you stop it, we’ll do a trade. If you don’t stop it, we’re not going to do any trade.'”

Delhi is rushing to negotiate a trade deal with the Trump administration before a 90-day pause on higher tariffs ends on 9 July.

Kashmir is a contentious issue for both India and and Pakistan, who claim the region in whole, but administer it only in part. Bilateral talks over several decades have not led to any resolution.

India treats Kashmir as an integral part of its territory and rules out any negotiation, particularly through a third party.

Tensions escalated between the South Asian neighbours after India blamed Pakistan for a 22 April attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir in which 26 people, mainly tourists, were killed. Islamabad denied the charge.

In May, India carried out air strikes on what it called terrorist infrastructure inside Pakistan, leading to four days of intense military action from both sides of the border.

Both countries accused each other of targeting airbases and other military sites.

As the conflict between the two nuclear-armed nations threatened to escalate further, Trump announced on 10 May that India and Pakistan had agreed to a “full and immediate ceasefire”, brokered by the US.

Later, in a post on Truth Social, he said: “I will work with you both to see if, after a thousand years, a solution can be arrived at, concerning Kashmir.” (The Kashmir issue only dates back to 1947).

A statement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio the same day said that the two countries had also agreed “to start talks on a broad set of issues at a neutral site”.

On 11 May, Trump repeated praise for India and Pakistan’s leaders for understanding it was “time to stop the current aggression”, adding that he was proud the US “was able to help you arrive at this historic and heroic decision”.

After Trump’s statement on the ceasefire, Pakistan’s foreign minister said the agreement had been reached by the two countries, adding that “three dozen countries” were involved in the diplomacy.

India has, however, consistently denied any intervention by the US.

Analysts say Trump’s very public statements on offers of mediation over Kashmir have tested Delhi’s red lines on the issue.

Delhi has always encouraged its Western partners not to treat India and Pakistan as equals. It also discourages western leaders from undertaking visits to India and Pakistan at the same time.

But Trump’s tweets often hold India and Pakistan as equals. This has caused some discomfort in Delhi’s diplomatic circles but analysts believe it’s too early to say whether this will affect ongoing trade deal talks between Washington and Delhi.

(BBC News)

Continue Reading

News

Ajith Perera explains his absence in Parliament

Published

on

By

MP Ajith P. Perera has said he was unable to attend Parliament on time today (June 18) to initiate the adjournment debate on the Israel-Iran conflict, after his vehicle was involved in an accident while on the way to Parliament.

In a Facebook Live, Perera confirmed he was unharmed and that no others were injured in the incident. He said he had to attend to matters following the accident, which delayed his arrival in Parliament by 04 minutes.

In Perera’s absence, MP Nizam Kariyappar attempted to proceed on behalf him. However, Leader of the House Bimal Ratnayake and Minister Vijitha Herath objected, citing procedural rules that a motion cannot be moved by a member on behalf of another.

This led to a brief tense situation and led to Deputy Speaker Rizvi Sally adjourning the House until 9.30am tomorrow (June 19).

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Sri Lanka Mirror. All Rights Reserved