India’s governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been within the limelight again ever since a party’s leading active leader allegedly made controversial remarks about Prophet Mohammad throughout a TV debate.
The provocative remarks made by BJP’s Nupur Sharma has additionally created an uproar within the Arab world. Adding fuel to fire one other saffron occasion another BJP chief Naveen Jindal allegedly made remarks on Prophet Muhammad.
With the growing opposition within the country itself and further in regional and Arab countries over the controversial remarks, the BJP had to suspend Nupur Sharma and Naveen Jindal from the first membership of the party, which is the one and only major step taken by Prime Minister Modi’s party against them ever since the controversial made by Sharma on May 28 throughout a TV debate.
And also, BJP additionally distanced itself from the controversy and issued a press release “strongly condemning” the insult to any non-secular particular person of any faith and underlined the fitting of each citizen to observe any faith of their selection.
In a letter to Nupur Sharma, the BJP’s Central Disciplinary Committee said that she has expressed opposite views on the occasion’s place on numerous issues, and therefore, she has been suspended from the occasion with speedy impact.
After Nupur Sharma was suspended she unconditionally withdrew the remarks that she had made on Prophet Muhammad.
Nupur stated in a press release that ‘Mahadev’ is being insulted and insulted constantly for the final number of days. “It was being jokingly stated that it was not a ‘Shivling’ however a fountain. The (Gyanvapi) Shivling was even in comparison with roadside indicators and sticks in Delhi,” he stated.
“I couldn’t bear this fixed insult and disrespect in the direction of my Mahadev and I stated a few issues in response to it. If my phrases have harmed anybody’s non-secular sentiments or harm anybody’s non-secular sentiments, I’ll without Situation withdraw my assertion. It was by no means my intention. To harm anybody’s non-secular sentiments,” Sharma stated in her apology.
A case was registered against Nupur on May 28 for making objectionable remarks following a complaint lodged by Irfan Sheikh, joint secretary of Raza Academy, an Islamist group based in Maharashtra.
Nupur was charged under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 295A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs), 153A (promoting enmity between groups) and 505(2) (statements conducing to public mischief), police had said.
The protests were sparked in many parts of India including Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Kanpur areas over the remarks.
Meanwhile, Nupur and her family were provided security by the Delhi Police today after she filed a complaint for allegedly being harassed and getting death threats.
When a case against Sharma was taken up at India’s Supreme Court, the Court criticised Nupur Sharma for her remarks about the Prophet Muhammad, declaring that her “loose tongue” had “put the entire country on fire,” and requiring her to make an instant public apology.
“She actually has a loose tongue and has made all kinds of irresponsible statements on TV and set the entire country on fire. Yet, she claims to be a lawyer of 10 years standing… She should have immediately apologised for her comments to the whole country,” the court said.
Modi’s government’s lethargy approach to settle the issue will eventually damage India’s ties with the Arab world and Iran.
The UAE, Oman, Indonesia, Iraq, the Maldives, Jordan, Libya and Bahrain have joined with a few other Muslim nations to condemn the remarks. Kuwait, Iran and Qatar had called Indian ambassadors to register their protest while Saudi Arabia had issued a strongly worded statement.
Although the Indian diplomats were trying to placate these countries but no signs of ending the crisis.
“Allowing such Islamophobic remarks to continue without punishment, constitutes a grave danger to the protection of human rights and may lead to further prejudice and marginalisation, which will create a cycle of violence and hate,” Qatar’s ministry of foreign affairs said.
“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed its condemnation and denunciation of the statements made by the spokeswoman of the BJP,” Saudi Arabia said.
The 57-member Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and Pakistan have also criticised India. But the Delhi government criticised both, saying their comments were “unwarranted and narrow-minded”.
India’s ambassador to Qatar, Deepak Mittal, said the remarks from some fringe elements did not represent the views of the Indian government. However, Qatar said it expected a public apology from India.
However, analysts say that BJP is not taking the matter seriously because the party’s response may not be enough to stop the growing opposition to Modi’s government. The party and the government should make responsible public statements on the issue without giving a ‘just’ statement over the issue, analysts say.
In another aspect, the BJP government’s lethargy approach to solving the crisis will also risk having an unstable situation in the region due to the presence of the Muslim population in these countries mainly in the South Asian countries. Already the Maldives had condemned the remarks and Pakistan strongly criticised the remarks.
Although the Muslim community in some of the major countries in the Asian region have not publicly shown their opposition to the controversial remarks, the time is not too far to come out them considering the growing global opposition against India’s silence over the issue.
At a time when the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria’s (ISIS) was trying to gain its lost ground as well as to spread its ideology, issues like the Nupur Sharma controversy will help such groups to re-emerge their lost image.
Using such issues, terrorist organisations ability to win the hearts of frustrated Muslims, especially the youth from varied socio-demographic backgrounds has only posed a major threat to international security as well as regional security. Although in India, ISIS has failed to make any meaningful entry, letting growing opposition to the issue will open new entry into India.
In a latest development, a suicide bomber from ISIS, detained in Russia was given the sole task of killing Nupur Sharma, Indian media recently reported quoting top intelligence sources. That was one of the outcomes of the issue.
Analysts say that hate speech and attacks against Muslims have risen since the BJP came to power in 2014. In this background, Sharma’s comments reflect the deep religious polarisation that the country has been witnessing over the past few years.
On a chilly December morning, a group of women wrapped in colourful saris, warm shawls and woollen caps huddled outside a three-storey building in a busy neighbourhood in Delhi.
Within the walls of the building ran a unit of one of India’s oldest social enterprises, owned and run by women.
The co-operative – now called Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad – was started in 1959 in Mumbai (then Bombay) by seven housewives who made the humble papad or poppadoms, a crispy, savoury snack that is a staple of Indian meals.
Sixty-five years later, the co-operative – headquartered in Mumbai – has spread across India with more than 45,000 women members. It has an annual turnover of 16bn rupees ($186m; £150m) and exports products to countries including the UK and US.
Working mostly from home, the women in this co-operative produce items including detergents, spices and chapatis (flatbreads), but their most-loved product is the Lijjat brand of poppadoms.
“Lijjat is a temple for us. It helps us earn money and feed our families,” says Lakshmi, 70, who manages the Delhi centre.
Ms Lakshmi, who uses only one name, joined the co-operative about four decades ago after her husband died, which forced her to look for work.
“I hadn’t finished my studies and didn’t know what else to do. That’s when my neighbour told me about Lijjat,” she says.
The decision to join the women’s co-operative transformed her life, she says. She now manages 150 women at the centre.
For women like Ms Lakshmi, the co-operative offers a chance to earn a decent income while balancing their work at home.
The women produce spices and detergents among other products
Every morning, the women members take a bus hired by the co-operative to the nearest Lijjat centre. There, they collect their share of pre-mixed dough made with lentils and spices, which they take home to roll into poppadoms.
“I used to go home with this dough and do all my housework, feed my children and sit with my chakla [a flat wooden board] and a belan [rolling pin] in the afternoon to make small round thin papads,” says Ms Lakshmi.
Initially, it took her four-five hours to make 1kg of dried lentil papad, but she says she can now produce that amount in just half an hour.
The head office in Mumbai buys raw materials like lentils, spices and oil in bulk, mixes the flour and sends it to Lijjat offices around the country.
Once the women make and dry the poppadoms at home, they deliver them back to the centre for packaging. Lijjat’s distributor network then transports the products to retail shops.
The enterprise has come a long way since it was founded.
In the 1950s, a newly independent India was focusing on rebuilding itself, trying to strike a balance between promoting small-scale, rural industries and pushing for large urban factories.
It was also a time when the government owned most of the factories in the country. Life for women was especially challenging as they had to negotiate a deeply conservative and patriarchal society to get educated and work.
The group of women who founded Lijjat – Jaswantiben Jamnadas Poppat, Parvatiben Ramdas Thodani, Ujamben Narandas Kundalia, Banuben N Tanna, Laguben Amritlal Gokani, Jayaben V Vithalani and Diwaliben Lukka – were in their 20s and 30s, living in a crowded tenement in Mumbai and looking for ways to support their families.
Their idea was simple – work from home and earn money by using the cooking skills passed down to them through generations of women.
The Lijjat brand of poppadoms is much-loved in many parts of India
But they did not have money to buy ingredients and sought financial assistance from Chhaganlal Karamshi Parekh, a social worker.
He offered them a loan of 80 rupees ($0.93; £0.75 at today’s rates), which was enough to get started at the time.
But the women soon realised that there were no takers for their poppadoms. Narrating the story, Swati Paradkar, the current president of the co-operative, says that the women had to return to Parekh for help.
He again lent them 80 rupees, but this time with the condition that they would repay 200 rupees to him. Parekh – whom the women called Bappa (meaning father) – and other social workers took the poppadoms to local shopkeepers, who agreed to stock them only if they could pay after the products were sold.
Only one shopkeeper agreed to pay the women immediately. “He began purchasing four to six packets daily and gradually the poppadoms became quite popular,” Ms Paradkar says.
As the business grew, more women joined the co-operative – not as employees, but as co-owners with a say in decision-making. The women call each other ben or sister in Gujarati.
“We are like a co-operative and not a company. Even though I am the president, I am not the owner. We are all co-owners and have equal rights. We all share profits and even losses,” Ms Paradkar says. “I think that’s the secret of our success.”
For decades, the co-operative produced its poppadoms without the iconic Lijjat brand name.
In 1966, the Khadi Development And Village Industries Commission, a government organisation to promote small rural industries, suggested that they come up with a brand name.
The co-operative placed an advertisement in newspapers asking for suggestions. “We received a lot of entries but one of our own sisters suggested Lajjat. We tweaked it to Lijjat, which means taste in Gujarati”, Ms Paradkar says.
Over the decades, the co-operative has allowed generations of women to attain financial independence.
“Today I have put my children through school, built a house and got them married,” says Ms Lakshmi.
“Working here, I have found not just an income but respect.”
Political commentator/analyst Kusal Perera has issued a people centric program for North – East for social discourse which is as follows :
“ _Post-war issues the north-east wanted answers for, will not get trashed merely because 29% in N-E voted for NPP_ .”
– Kusal Perera / Daily FT 30 Nov.2024
North-East clearly exhibited its frustration and anger against traditional political leaderships. It is a fact, traditional political parties and leaderships don’t have a “people-centric” perspective, working on the understanding they could always manipulate the vote, in the absence of alternate leaderships.
This 2024 elections proved the people are no more ready to be manipulated to vote them as representatives of the people. At least a substantial majority in North-East did not, creating a space for an alternate action programme at grassroot level.
That action programme is proposed here as a two-part programme with initial demands in this current context and as the organisational democratic platform for a campaign.
Demands are – 01. all 22 Tamil and Muslim MPs (including NPP) in North-East issue a joint statement, confirming they stand for “full implementation” of the 13 Amendment to the Constitution
02. all 22 Tamil and Muslim MPs (including NPP) in North-East table a motion in parliament within month of December 2024, demanding the government announce they would implement the 13A in full and hold PC elections before end March 2025.
03. Public demand asking the President to present the APRC Final Report in parliament immediately (as the LLRC Report was presented)
04. De-militarise North-East administration as stressed in LLRC Final Report in establishing a civil administration
05. Minister of Justice and National Integration to provide a comprehensive list of “enforced disappearances” during and after the war to the parliament, with details and the present situation/status within 03 months
Campaign platform to constitute – 1. District level action committees consisting of people’s organisations, trade unions and professional associations
2. Federation of district action committees forming the N-E campaign platform
3. District Action Committees to form its local actions committees as electoral or professional committees
This is meant for a public discussion among North-East social activists and remains open for due amendments and alterations for improvement and implementation.
Kusal Perera – Political commentator/Analyst 2024 December 01
A video of a fashion shoot in India has gone viral and unexpectedly turned a group of underprivileged school children into local celebrities.
The footage shows the children, most of them girls between the ages of 12 and 17, dressed in red and gold outfits fashioned from discarded clothes.
The teenagers designed and tailored the outfits and also doubled up as models to showcase their creations, with the grubby walls and terraces of the slum providing the backdrop for their ramp walk.
The video was filmed and edited by a 15-year-old boy.
The girls chose accessories by watching fashion designer Sabyasachi Mukherjee’s Instagram videos
The video first appeared earlier this month on the Instagram page of Innovation for Change, a non-governmental organisation (NGO) in the city of Lucknow.
The charity works with about 400 children from the city’s slums, providing them free food, education and job skills. The children featured in the shoot are students of this NGO.
Mehak Kannojia, one of the models in the video, told the BBC that she and her fellow students closely followed the sartorial choices of Bollywood actresses on Instagram and often duplicated some of their outfits for themselves.
“This time, we decided to pool our resources and worked as a group,” the 16-year-old said.
For their project, they chose wisely – a campaign by Sabyasachi Mukherjee, one of India’s top fashion designers who has dressed Bollywood celebrities, Hollywood actresses and billionaires. In 2018, Kim Kardashian wore his sequinned red sari for a Vogue shoot.
Mukherjee is also known as the “king of weddings” in India. He has dressed thousands of brides, including Bollywood celebrities such as Anushka Sharma and Deepika Padukone. Priyanka Chopra married Nick Jonas in a stunning red Sabyasachi outfit.
The girls said they stitched about a dozen outfits in three-four days
Mehak said their project, called Yeh laal rang (the colour red), was inspired by the designer’s heritage bridal collection.
“We sifted through the clothes that had come to us in donation and picked out all the red items. Then we zeroed in on the outfits we wanted to make and began putting them together.”
It was intense work – the girls stitched about a dozen outfits in three-four days but, Mehak says, they had “great fun doing it”.
For the ramp walk, Mehak says they studied the models carefully in Sabyasachi videos and copied their moves.
“Just like his models, some of us wore sunglasses, one drank from a sipper with a straw, while another walked carrying a cloth bundle under her arm.”
Some of it, Mehak says, came together organically. “At one point in the shoot, I was supposed to laugh. At that moment, someone said something funny and I just burst out laughing.”
The outfits were fashioned from donated clothes
It was an ambitious project, but the result has won hearts in India. Put together on a shoestring budget with donated clothes, the video went viral after Mukherjee reposted it on his Instagram feed with a heart emoji.
The campaign won widespread praise, with many on social media comparing their work to that of professionals.
The viral video has brought enormous attention to the charity and its school has been visited by several TV channels, some of the children were invited to participate in shows on popular FM radio stations and Bollywood actress Tamannah Bhatia visited them to accept a scarf from the children.
The response, Mehak says, has been “totally unexpected”.
“It feels like a dream come true. All my friends are sharing the video and saying ‘you’ve become famous’. My parents were full of joy when they heard about all the attention we are getting.
“We are feeling wonderful. Now we have only one dream left – to meet Sabyasachi.”
The fashion shoot has won widespread praise in India
The shoot, however, also received criticism, with some wondering if showing young girls dressed as brides could encouraged child marriage in a country where millions of girls are still married off by their families before they turn 18 – the legal age.
The Innovation for Change addressed the concern in a post on Instagram, saying they had no intention to encourage child marriage.
“Our aim is not to promote child marriage in any way. Today, these girls are able to do something like this by fighting against such ideas and restrictions. Please appreciate them, otherwise the morale of these children will fall.”